USC DE Kameryn Crawford tackles IOWA WR Kaden Wetjen during the first half of the Trojans’ 26-21 win Saturday at the Coliseum. (Eric Thayer / LAT)-
USC rallied from a 21-7 deficit to defeat Iowa 26-21 in steady rain, showcasing the toughness that has eluded Lincoln Riley during his USC tenure.
-
The Trojans’ gutsy win keeps them alive in the College Football Playoff race with Oregon and UCLA up next.
-
Riley and USC proved they are capable of winning critical games in the Big Ten.
Bill Plaschke (LA Times) — They were battered, they were bruised, they were soaking wet and covered in stereotypes.
They’re not tough enough. They’re not resilient enough.
They’re not Big Ten-enough. Late in the second quarter Saturday afternoon at the Coliseum, a USC football team fighting for a playoff berth was crumbling beneath the weight of its worst national perception.
It was wilting under the weather and the weight of a team from Iowa.
Then, with big swings from a deep strength that few thought a Lincoln Riley team possessed, everything changed.
It’s raining wins, hallelujah.
Trailing 21-7, the Trojans got muddy and chilly and just plain mean, winning the line of scrimmage, winning the battle of skill, and eventually winning the game 26-21.
Yeah, afterward, that was Riley dancing in a downpour.
And, yes, USC is still in the national championship hunt, needing wins in its final two games at Oregon and against UCLA to qualify for the College Football Playoff.
Few will believe they can beat sixth-ranked and one-loss Oregon in Eugene. But then again, few believed they would survive Iowa after the Hawkeyes took that big second-quarter lead.
During the last 10 years, Iowa had an 83-5 record when leading by eight points or more. Translated, this is a program that knows how to protect a lead, and the Trojans were seemingly cooked.
But Makai Lemon made 153 yards worth of spectacular catches, King Miller ran for 83 bruising clock-killing yards, Jahkeem Stewart made a game-changing interception, Jayden Maiava held it together with a touchdown pass and no turnovers, and the game essentially appropriately ended with USC just being stronger.

On a fourth-down pass in the final minute, Kennedy Urlacher shoved Kaden Wetjen out of bounds as he was making a grab deep in Trojan territory.
No catch, game over, and in the end, the Trojans were as hearty as that section of fans that witnessed the game shirtless.
The afternoon started with groundskeepers drying the field with leaf blowers, the first rainy game at the Coliseum in nine years.
USC coach Lincoln Riley celebrates with WR Prince Strachan during the second half of a 26-21 comeback win over IOWA at the Coliseum on Saturday. (Eric Thayer / LAT)
But for USC under Riley, it felt the same, a late-season game requiring the sort of grimy toughness that his Trojans had yet to show.
Blew five fourth-quarter leads last season. Blew four of their last five games two seasons ago. Blew the Pac-12 championship game and a shot at the playoffs three seasons ago.
It looked like they were going to blow it again.
Iowa took the opening kickoff and drove 69 yards in seven plays in a bruising drive punctuated by a fourth-down, two-yard touchdown pass from Mark Gronowski to Dayton Howard in the back of the end zone.
Yes, the FBS’s 133rd ranked passing offense — out of 136 teams — had just scored on a pass play.
And Iowa was just getting started.
After stopping the Trojans’ Miller on a fourth-down run around just inside Iowa territory — a terrible Riley call against the nation’s best fourth-down defense — the Hawkeyes drove 45 yards in nine plays to score on a Gronowski one-yard push to take a 14-0 lead.
The Trojans came back while finally finding their groove, driving 74 yards on 11 plays featuring a leaping catch by Ja’Kobi Lane and ending with a one-yard touchdown run out of the wildcat formation by Bryan Jackson.
So USC had the momentum? Not so fast.
USC DT Jide Abasiri holds up the ball while celebrating with CB Decarlos Nicholson during the second half of the Trojans’ win Saturday over IOWA. (Eric Thayer / LAT)
Iowa took the possession and pounded and pounded and nine plays and 75 yards later scored on a five-yard, trick-play pass from receiver Reece Vander Zee to Gronowski.
That gave Iowa a 21-7 lead that was shortened only by a Ryon Sayeri 40-yard field goal after a dropped pass and penalty stopped the Trojans.
USC took the ball at the start of the third quarter and seemed to be destined for a touchdown after a leaping sideline catch by Lemon. But a holding call against Lane ruined a long run by Miller, two failed pass plays stalled the drive, and the Trojans had to settle for a 29-yard field goal by Sayeri to close the gap to 21-13.
After the Trojans defense stiffened, the offense went back on a roll, using another leaping grab by Lemon — this one for 35 yards — to set up a 12-yard TD pass between three defenders to Lemon. Maiava overthrew Lemon on the two-point conversion attempt, but this time, the Trojans didn’t blow the momentum.
On Iowa’s next possession, with 1:52 left in the period, the powerful freshman Stewart grabbed a deflected pass for an interception to give the Trojans the ball on the Iowa 40-yard line.
From there, Maiava drove them 40 yards in six plays on a possession that was assisted by a pass interference penalty and gave them an eventual 26-21 lead after Jackson’s one-yard touchdown run.
It was a lead they never lost.
It is a season that still matters.
latimes.com
___________
TrojanDailyBlog members — We always encourage you to add factual information, insight, divergent opinions, or new topics to the TDB that don’t necessarily pertain to any particular moderator post or member comment.
Mark Kulkin has a good USC podcast. But he’s a sunshine pumper. Every week during one of his shows he will make a prediction for the score of the upcoming USC game. I’ve never seen him predict that USC will lose. He always picks USC to win. He’s picking them over Oregon. I hope he’s right but I would never bet any money on that. Betting on USC over Oregon at Autzen is a bad bet. We have a number of key people out for that game so we are going to have to plug and play. You might also… Read more »
Agree. I’d love to pick USC, but I can’t with an objective conscience. Still, we have a “puncher’s chance,” if that’s possible on a team dominated by wide receivers. It’s a big-time USC thing. We ALWAYS have great WRs. But I just don’t think I can count on the USC D yet to be as successful against these Ducks and their killer running game. If we somehow beat ORE this weekend in Eugene, that would be the biggest win since when Sam Darnold led USC to its amazing Rose Bowl victory over PSU. That game still reverberates in my head… Read more »
If SC plays their best game on both sides of the LOS then they have an excellent chance of winning.
Ryan Abraham actually picked the ducks to win. He’s more realistic than Mark Kulkin. Kulkin is a dye hard USC football fan. Not the kind of guy you want to listen to when you’re trying to get advice on who to bet on. Like I said, if SC plays their A+ game on both sides of the LOS, they most certainly can win this game. Oregon is hard to beat at Autzin. The last time we beat them there was in 2011. We were ahead in that game 38-14 with 3 1/2 minutes left in the 3rd quarter. But they… Read more »
Just a fantastic game to watch. I’ll always remember it. We were crazy with tension watching the Ducks come back (as so many ORE fans totally expected them to do because of the nature of their team).
But Lane Kiffin’s 10-2 USC team held ’em off, and the rejoicing began! USC couldn’t go to a bowl game, so we took it out on UCLA 50-0 to end the season the next week.
I was convinced that they were going to win the NC in 2012. I still don’t know what happened.
I am not saying I am particularly bullish, and I am not calling the win for SC, but my perspective is shifting a bit on this Oregon game: Oregon is 9-1, and Dan Lanning is 24-2 at Autzen. But who have the Ducks faced this year? Only three ranked teams – Penn State, Indiana, and Iowa. Only one of those teams is currently ranked – Indiana. The Ducks lost to Indiana … at home. As to the other two, Oregon needed two OTs to beat Penn State, meaning even UCLA has common opponent bragging rights over Oregon on that one. Iowa pushed Oregon hard…Oregon won by… Read more »
SC has a good enough offense to win a NC. They are #6 in the nation offensively. True…..in the last 5 games they have only averaged 28 points a game. But 4 of those 5 teams that they played are in the top 17 in the nation defensively. The 5th team is ND and they are #30 defensively. So all 5 of those teams are top 30 teams defensively…..not to mention that their next opponent(Oregon) is # 3 in the nation defensively. They have the kind of offense you need to win a NC. But defensively they are only 47th… Read more »
Oregon, like USC [ and I suspect most teams], is better at home than away: O scoring average at home is 42 versus away, 34. and their D is a patry 12 at home, 16 away.
All these coaching openings will be interesting for sure. Too many openings for too few proven talent. One or two may hit the jackpot with the next Cignetti or Carroll. Most I bet will hire retreads and has beens. 4 years from now they will be exactly where they are now. Looks like Seven win Sark may get to 8 but not 9 and out of the top 25.
I hope some of these programs try giving young talented coordinators a chance rather than going the route of the retreads. The only proven big name is James Franklin. I don’t see Lane Kiffin leaving but he might if the right offer comes along.
SC still doesn’t have the defense to win a NC. Look at the top 11 teams in the nation and where they are rated defensively.
1) OSU….#1 defensively)
2) Indiana ….#4 defensively
3) Tex AM…..#31 defensively
4) Georgia ….#20 defensively
5) Ole Miss…..#29 Def
6) Oregon….3rd Def
7) TTU……8th Def
8) Oklahoma…..11th Def
9) ND…..30th Def
10) Bama…..14th Def
11) BYU…..25th Def
16) USC…..47th Def
There’s been improvement over the Grench years but not enough to really take a shot at the NC.
Saturday, November 22: Another rainy day in Eugene [ showers]. winds 5-10 mph
actually it’s not supposed to rain saturday in eugene
He’s a bonafide Superstar!
Longtime Hawkeyes HC (and villain to Trojans nationwide) Kirk Ferentz said Makai Lemon “is as good as I’ve seen. I mean, going back 20-plus years.”
Current Standings as of 11.16.2025
BUS83 56000Rialto Trojan 39000Illinois Trojan 36000GoldenTrojan 30000Dubpar22 27000Scoochnew 26000TommeTrojan 23000TrojanRJJ 17500MrsSteveg 12000Figueroa 6000
Click Here for a list of the game by game individual results…
Bus and Illinois killed it going double or nothing. Congrats!
Thanks GT.
AP top 25 poll: Nov. 16 1 Ohio State 2 Indiana 3 Texas A&M 4 Georgia 5 Ole Miss 6 Texas Tech and Oregon 8 Oklahoma 9 Notre Dame 10 Alabama 11 BYU 12 Vanderbilt 13 Utah 14 Miami 15 Georgia Tech 16 USC 17 Texas 18 Michigan 19 Virginia 20 Tennessee 21 James Madison 22 North Texas 23 Missouri 24 Tulane 25 Houston Coaches poll rankings: Nov. 16 1 Ohio State 2 Indiana 3 Texas A&M 4 Georgia 5 Oregon 6 Ole Miss 7 Texas Tech 8 Oklahoma 9 Notre Dame 10 Alabama 11 BYU 12 Georgia Tech… Read more »
Does SC have a path to the playoffs even with wins over Oregon and UCLA? 12 spots available but SC has to finish in the top 10 to get a spot. 3 spots taken by ACC champ, Group of 5 “champ”, and Notre Dame. That leaves 9. Big 12 champ is in, and Big 12 runner up could be 11-2. Three Big 12 teams currently ranked ahead of SC. Last year the committee made it clear you won’t get left out for losing your conference championship game (SMU). But let’s just say the Big 12 only gets one team in and all… Read more »
I think USC’s a 10-2 (8-1 and 3rd place in the B1G) playoff shoe-in if we beat ORE and UCLA, period. To keep us out, well, I just don’t see that coming, regardless of the mental gymnastics that can be used to argue otherwise. JMHO.
I hope you’re right.
Look at today’s Top 25 polls. The coaches have 5 SEC teams in the top 10 — aTm, Georgia, Ole, Miss, Oklahoma, and Alabama. Do you think SC jumps any of them next week with a win over Oregon?
I simply think USC gets in if it wins out. Beating AP #6/Coaches #5 ORE in Eugene gets us in regardless what other teams do. JMHO.
What’s your prediction for SC’s place in next week’s AP poll if they beat Oregon? Mine is 10-11.
Sounds excellent to me …
Not if they all win too.
I agree If we beat Oregon in Eugene. But that’s a pretty big If
You can say that again. This is one of those for sure head vs heart things.
I’d like to see SC take this game down to the wire(even if we lose) and not get run out of town. That would tell me that we are really making some progress in this experiment with LR. If we make them fight to the very end to win this game, even if we lose, I think we will beat UCLA and whatever bowl game they put us in and that will give us 10 wins for the season ands seconds away from winning 11 games. That will show progress and help our recruiting for 2027 and 2028
No, that would be 9 wins, 3 loses.[ lose to the Ducks, Beat the Ruins]; if SC beats UCLA and their bowl game, that would be 10 W, assuming we lose in Eugene, which I don’t want to do.
Of course, I want SC to win. I’m just saying what would show me some progress for the whole season.
I’m just redoing your math
I’m not much for moral victories. We’ve already shown a lot of improvement. Now it’s time to beat teams like ORE when the playoffs are on the line, but most don’t think we’re ready for that. LR deserves a lot of credit for making some changes to get USC to 8-2 and beat teams like MICH and IOWA. But we’ve still got a ways to go. I don’t expect USC to beat ORE in Eugene which may be just as well for now, because even if we get into the playoffs, we won’t get far. Maybe getting into a good… Read more »
I’m not much for moral victories either but that’s a long contract we signed with LR which means he’s going to be around for awhile before they buy him out. If he’s going to be around for awhile I’d at least like to see us moving in the right direction. That way the next coach would feel he has something to build on which would, I hope, attract a lot of prospects.
I heard a couple of guys on Sirius channel 84 Sunday morning that were speculating about the possibility of LR taking one of the many SEC jobs that are open and that there may be another SEC opening in the Deep South. That’s not the opening at Ole Miss created by Kiffin taking the UF job. They were implying Kalen DeBoer being asked to leave ALA. Words are a dime a dozen.
these guys were certain that Kiffin will take the Florida job.
I’d love to see Kiffin spurn them all and stay put. And he’s just the kind of non-conformist to do it. Building a powerhouse out of Ole Miss would actually be a bigger accomplishment than doing it at FL. Thing is, he still has plenty of time to get back into a top program even after staying on several more years with the Rebels.
But who am I to plan another person’s life…just saying what I’d like to see. His success at Ole Miss is a super cool cfb story to me.
I agree, Lane Kiffin will be king of Oxford for as long as he wants. Beautiful college town, less pressure. He would be a fool to be immersed in the cauldron known as “jean-shorts-nation” at UF.
Jean-shorts-nation is not a complement, either.
I hope Lane stays at OLE MISS. He’s created something really good there where he’s already practically walking on water. Places like UF and LSU could end up driving the poor guy nuts. Maybe he’ll say no to the ridiculous pressure on the next coaches to quickly fix these huge southern, football-crazed brands looking for rebuilds? With so much complexity introduced to the new game of CFB, some of these huge jobs may not be what they are cracked up to be behind the scenes. This entire coaching replacement extravaganza is gonna be so intriguing to watch. I wonder what… Read more »
Stay in your lane … Kiffin. Ole Miss has a comfy schedule, few expectations, and don’t mind their coach being little more than a social media influencer. Florida not so much, big expectations there. Will end up like Snark at Texas. Once the honeymoon ends, see ya. Like so many times before.
All that is irrelevant because LR will win 9 games this year and with a bowl win it will be 10. That means he will be back next year. I don’t think he wants to take an SEC job. I really don’t think he likes tough schedules. I’m not sure he was crazy about going into the Big 10. But all of that is speculation.
Many OU fans were vociferously adamant that LR intentionally split from OU because he didn’t want to fight it out in the SEC, so he took over at USC where the Pac-12 obviously provided easier overall comp. Frankly, it sounds reasonable, especially for the massive $ and great terms USC was offering. Do any of us think LR actually knew USC might be headed to the B1G when he took the job? Nothing has ever been produced which would lead any of us to believe that. LR has shown improvement this season. USC still has a long way to go,… Read more »
Iowa had a great defense. Some people say their DC is the best in college football. We scored more against Iowa than any other team with the exception of Rutgers(and they played Iowa State, Indiana and Oregon) and we did it all in the 2nd half in Iowa kind of weather. We beat them at their own game.
Sound D, tackle well.
LR was ready and found a lot of holes in that zone. SC scored on 5 straight possessions and were a non-PI call, cheap D hold call on the sack cause fumble from putting up a 40 spot.
More than anything Herkies run so much clock and limit possessions. They were even huddling and snapping the ball with 3 seconds on play clock when behind.
I agree: When all is said and done [ and more is said than done], when push comes to shove, that “toenail” on the white line was the difference [ an inch or 2]]; yes there were many other close calls that we can argue about, but in the end…that’s all that counts.
9-3 was my ceiling this year, with all these road games, but SC was actually better than that. Especially when the RBs were not hurt. Unfortunately, the D had been a big let down vs teams that could run and throw.
9-3 and a bowl win, 10-3 is a big step forward.
Agreed. But SC is not a NC team yet. Eleven out of the last 25 NC’s finished #1 in the nation in defense. 22 out of the last 25 NC’s finished in the top 10 in defense. This year SC is 47th in the nation in total defense. That’s not good enough
No more close losses … let’s win a close one!
Every team has a bad game. Oregon is due for one of those Saturdays where nothing goes right—let’s hope it happens THIS Saturday!
As long as we’re hoping, how about hoping the ducks play a great game and USC still beats them!
Baby steps, VT, baby steps!
Gotta hatch before you can fly?
On first read, I thought you were reacting to Va.Tech hiring James Franklin. Silly me.
Indeed … have to go Iowa on them. Run clock, flip field (no more crappy calls on 4th and not that short in own territory) no big plays, make quacks work for scores (no Illini and ND 6 gash play drives) take points when can especially early (unlike ND). Maybe even go against tendencies on 1st D series to not give up another opening TD for 7th game in a row (or ND like 60 yd run on 1st play).
Lot of wishing, begging, hoping, and praying in this game LOL
Again the issue we discussed right before the start of the season where if you start outside of the top 25, it is much tougher to climb into the top 12.
Climbing back up out of the muck of the unranked is a GRIND.
ALA just lost to OU yesterday at home, and opened the season with a bad 31-17 loss to 5-5 FSU, and they’re still ranked way ahead of us — because they started way ahead of us.
Precisely my point. I don’t think a win at Oregon vaults SC past Alabama, and there are 4 SEC teams ranked ahead of Alabama already.
USC doesn’t have to get past ALA. We only need to get to 11 or 12.
No, because two teams not ranked in the top 12 will get spots. ACC champ and best of G5
I think that has changed: now the 5 conf champs, plus 7 other highest ranked? 🙄
What has changed since last year is the seeding.
What hasn’t changed is that the five highest ranked conference champs get automatic bids, regardless of whether they’re ranked in the top 12 in the final CFP ranking.
Right now, there are only three conferences represented in the top 12. No one from the ACC or any G5 conference. Assuming that doesn’t change, that means teams from the B1G or SEC have to finish in the top 10 to get one of the 7 at-large spots.
just get to 12. we don’t need to get to 11.
rankings are skewed in favor of results from the previous season.
And one more thing…kinda nice getting that 2nd half kickoff, wasn’t it LR?
2 scores before Iowa got the ball, difference in the game right there.
Well not quite, Iowa got a 3 and out to end the half.
that’s worth repeating.
My big bitch around here being validated! Except I think Iowa had to do us that favor because they won the toss and took the ball. Arguably a good choice from them as the field conditions were expected to worsen over the course of the game. But for me, that two-for-one is really big – it can fuel comebacks or it can allow a team to separate meaningfully if managed right. It worked for us this time.
My takeaway from the first half being able to see the secondary and running lanes from my perch on high is that Iowa played with excellent disciple. They were covering our receivers very well, and their D line and LBs were playing great gap discipline. Our defense, on the other hand, was lost at times and fell for every hint of trickery, often over pursuing…the same mistakes that have plagues the USC D for years. However, 2nd half was a complete turn-around and rarely made the mistakes of the first half. Really need a complete game next week, but this… Read more »
It was the hundreds of shirtless dudes, VT. It changed the crowd dynamic!
Had to be. Let’s launch a go-fund-me and pay for about 5,000 USC young shirtless roadies to invade Autzen on Saturday.
I like it!
(And now for something totally inappropriate)
I thought USC was progressive, shouldn’t there have been some ladies in that bunch?
(if my wife asks I never posted this)
Might have been a Title IX violation denying them equal access! 😉
By the way, did you convert your niece?
Oh yeah, she mistakenly clapped for Iowa when they came out of the tunnel for the first time, but by the 4th quarter she was on her feet screaming like a life long Trojan!
Good for her.
by the way, i kinda liked how the Iowa team ran onto the field in formation.
Me too, I’ve never seen that before. Makes me wonder if they do that all the time, both home and away.
I like the team unity and cohesiveness of it, rather than a random stream and trickle of players out of the tunnel to various parts of the field, each player seemingly in their own little world. In short, more us and less me.
I looked it up. They’ve been doing it for 40 years. They call it “The Swarm.” I’d never seen or heard of it before.
They’re the Hawkeyes, shouldn’t it be a “flock”?
Nope.
Based on the literary origin of “Hawkeye” and “the Hawkeye State,” “The Tribe” would be more accurate.
Nice research. Too bad GA Tech didn’t get swarm first.
The OSU/UCLA over/under is 31.5. Will all the points be by OSU? OSU 27-0 at the half.
Both of my bets were busts. Ucla lost by 38 and USC didn’t cover the spread. I’m still happy though.
The Game In a Nutshell Ryan Kartje (LAT) — The dark clouds had parted. The rain, after soaking L.A. for more than a day, had slowed. By that point, at the start of a stellar, second-half turnaround Saturday, all hope of a College Football Playoff bid for USC had nearly washed away in a first-half downpour. But that’s precisely when USC found its silver lining, with Makai Lemon scorching his way across the end zone, calling for the ball. All season, Lemon had made the big plays whenever the Trojans’ offense needed him. But no performance from its top wideout was bigger than Saturday,… Read more »