The Pac-12 Network Is a Shambles!

A couple of hours later Washington and Utah would play for the title. But the commissioner was on defense that day, explaining away the series I’d written about the conference’s lavish offices, his bloated $5.3 million paycheck, the downtown-San Francisco office, and the chartered planes he enjoys.

He said, “we’re actually a media company as well.”

I’ve been thinking a lot about that line lately. Because at the time Scott had 170 employees on the payroll of the Pac-12 Network. He’s since laid off or furloughed the vast majority of them. If the Pac-12 is still a media company, it’s a hollow shell of an operation. One that isn’t currently scheduled to carry any of the conference football games this season.

The first six weeks of the season will be televised by a combination of ABC, ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, Fox and FS1. Fox will televise the Dec. 18 title game. A conference source told me that the Pac-12 hasn’t determined which networks might carry the rest of the Dec 18-19 weekend games.

It’s likely that ABC, ESPN and FS1 take at least three of them. Maybe a fourth. That would leave the Pac-12 Network with a game or two, maybe, if it still wants to be in the football-broadcast business.

We ought to back up right about here for context. Because when the Pac-12 launched the network leadership really didn’t know what it was doing. That’s become evident as I’ve talked with people involved in the launch.

“We weren’t wanted.”

The only option the Pac-12 had was to launch a network itself. It’s since been re-cast as some forward-thinking, ambitious endeavor led by Scott. Truth is, the Pac-12 misread the market then tried to shift the narrative. It helps explain why it ultimately failed in so many glaring ways, including gobbling up 170,000 square feet of expensive downtown-San Francisco real estate for the studios.

“I don’t think anyone who was sitting in the room at the table at the various meetings, including the presidents and consultants knew what they were doing,” said the source. “Nobody had launched a network and knew what it would take.”

The Pac-12 Network faked it from the start. Some of that was wild fun for those involved. The staffers worked crazy hours, and were passionate and innovative. They had no control over the botched distribution plans, or the swollen budget, or the fact that Scott inexplicably drew part of his salary from the network budget while contributing very little in the way of leadership.

The staffers cared deeply about the product. They worked hard. They left shops such as ESPN to be part of something ambitious and nimble. That it’s now ultimately left in shambles has to be heartbreaking for the producers, on-air staff, engineers and support staff who were there from the beginning.

That “media company” has been gutted. Months ago the conference tried to sell equity in its media rights. It wanted $500 million for a 10 percent stake. There were no takers. Now, the Pac-12 has laid off or furloughed the staff amid a pandemic. Worse yet, it doesn’t appear to have a plan.

Insiders tell me the Pac-12 Network hasn’t communicated with network employees sitting in limbo. Keep in mind, the furloughed staff aren’t drawing a salary while living in the Bay Area because the conference inexplicably planted the network there. There’s understandable angst, amplified recently when it was reported that Scott accelerated his own scheduled bonus and paid himself prior to the downsizing.

What exactly is the Pac-12 Network right now?

That’s become a question to ask. Because some believe there’s no coming back. But the conference is under contractual obligation to carry men’s and women’s basketball games on the network. It feels like the Pac-12 will have to bring some of the crew back at some point and try to produce some form of bare-bones broadcast. Maybe in conjunction with that Dec. 18-19 final weekend of college football? But what about the morning and evening football wrap-up shows?

Andrew Walker, a spokesperson for the conference, told me this week, “During the course of the season, Pac-12 Networks will be producing football content that will be distributed across the full breadth of Pac-12 Networks media platforms.”

No producers. No social media team. No writers left. Not currently anyway.

If a Saturday night wrap-up show is in the plans, that hasn’t yet been communicated to staff. If that “shoulder programming” happens, it might feature studio hosts Yogi Roth and Ashley Adamson. They remain on staff and both are widely regarded as talented. Too gifted, for sure, to be left hosting the conference’s webinars.

If the Pac-12 does produce some kind of wrap show it will air during the regular season without a football game as a lead in. Wrap your mind around that. After millions spent on a lease, equipment, consultants, talent, producers, studio sets, marketing and management salaries, the Pac-12 has almost nothing to show for it.

He caught heck for it. Deserved it, too. Because down deep, the commissioner had to know the whole thing was teetering. It was a money pit with disappointing distribution. The conference was also publicly bleeding money and about to launch that private-equity Hail Mary pass that fell incomplete.

Enter 9 a.m. kickoffs on Fox. Forever known now as, “Bloody Larrys.” ASU and USC will kick off on Nov. 7 at breakfast in an attempt to get some revenue and exposure that we all know could have more easily been won by simply investing in a great football conference and letting the world see it. The Pac-12 Networks were supposed to help do that, remember?

Scott is still out there defending the “media company” narrative. There’s virtually nothing left of the network. It has no games to air, few employees and a dim future.

The Pac-12 presidents and chancellors need to find a graceful exit from this model. It’s too costly and messy. The bulk of the operation needs to be outsourced. The conference media rights are up in 2024. The Pac-12 needs a partner or two that can absorb what’s left of the network and reconstruct it with improved and existing distribution. Basically, it needs someone who knows what it’s doing.

oregonlive.com

__________

TrojanDailyBlog members  —  Always feel free to add information or topics to the TDB which don’t necessarily pertain to any particular moderator post or member comment.

 

SUBSCRIBE HERE TO RECEIVE NOTICE OF NEW COMMENTS OR REPLIES.
Notify of
14 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rock2112
Noble Genius
Rock2112
Offline
October 14, 2020 5:07 pm

For all his incompetence, Larry Scott has proven to be a highly competent thief, and shame on the conference presidents that have allowed, and continue to allow, themselves to be “had” by him. You can’t even blame Scott anymore, you have to applaud him. Really. I wish I could convince 12 universities to gather together and pay me millions and millions of dollars to piss on everybody’s legs and tell ’em its raining.

TrojanRJJ
Noble Genius
TrojanRJJ
Offline
October 15, 2020 9:08 pm
Reply to  Rock2112

Rock, Totally agree. I admire both Larry Scott and Clay Helton. Both are incompetent at the performance of their actual jobs but geniuses at convincing their employers of the opposite. Scott is a magician. He has totally destroyed the PAC, or more precisely allowed the woke Presidents of the Pac to feel politically and morally comfortable which, in the end, made him a very rich man. Clay pulled off a similar stunt. He is making $4.5 million to not coach a football team. Well, even when he was actually trying to coach, he really wasn’t.

RialtoTrojan
Major Genius
RialtoTrojan
Offline
October 14, 2020 3:19 pm

I read and reread this article and I am wondering how the hell Larry Scott has a job? I pay for the PAC 12 channel, which holds USC football hostage a couple of times a year and isn’t very good at doing it, and wonder why I have to pay? Since the launch a prerequisite for signing up for a provider has been the PAC12 channel. I am familiar with as many companies that don’t carry the services as I am who do. And while I can get the BIG10 and SEC as part of the basic sports package, my… Read more »

ATL D.D.S.
Major Genius
ATL D.D.S.
Offline
October 15, 2020 5:37 am
Reply to  RialtoTrojan

For our USC Alumni Club viewing parties here in Atlanta, we had to find an out of the way sports bar that would pay extra to carry the PAC-12 channel. It wasn’t easy to find a spot.

TMC4USC
TMC4USC
Offline
October 14, 2020 1:35 pm

Larry Scott has taken the conference into an abyss. He’s not the one to lead the conference out of it. I still hold the unpopular opinion that USC needs to find a home elsewhere. Joining the Big-12 would be a great thing for the school other than adding a little more travel related expenses for non revenue earning sports. That should not be a deterrent. The Pac-12 is dying. Let it die. Let’s not die with it. USC is still a marquee name.

TrojanRJJ
Noble Genius
TrojanRJJ
Offline
October 14, 2020 2:22 pm
Reply to  TMC4USC

TMC, you are preaching to the choir. If we had an administration interested in nurturing and leveraging the unique culture, heritage, and legacy of USC, plans would already be underway to exit the Pac. However, SC has an administration now seemingly bent on destroying and replacing that culture, heritage and legacy in the name of “social justice” (I refer to Hayek and his “The Road to Serfdom” for just how toxic a concept “social justice” is). If you want a model as to what she is attempting to do, I would recommend Gibbon’s classic “Decline and Fall”‘s exposition of how… Read more »

ATL D.D.S.
Major Genius
ATL D.D.S.
Offline
October 15, 2020 5:51 am
Reply to  TrojanRJJ

RJJ, our collective IQ just went up by reading your post, man. Hayek and Gibbon in the same paragraph on a Sports Blog! Touche!

gametv
gametv
Offline
October 14, 2020 10:32 am

Great expose piece. I hope this puts more pressure on the Pac-12 presidents to either fire Scott or demand that he cuts his salary in half immediately. i believe they already hired someone to review it for them, right? I cant imagine how Scott keeps his job for the next couple years. Seems like it is time to be rid of this fool and to move forward. USC should use this time of uncertainty to determine what is best for USC, not for other schools, and then use all their influence and power to make it happen. My hope is… Read more »

Jamaica
Noble Genius
Jamaica
Offline
October 14, 2020 9:22 am

Frankly, Larry Scott & the University Presidents who oversee him, deserve each other. It is one thing to see the opportunity of something, but yet when you prepare to broadcast a product but don’t develop-support that product (winning teams) enough to where it is attractive, what the h**l are you thinking?

LawyerJohn
LawyerJohn
Offline
October 14, 2020 9:02 am

So Scott saw the Pac-12 Network “media company” start-up as his golden opportunity to get a second salary out of the Pac-12 budget. Hmmmm– So Scott has a money incentive to keep the sinking ship Pac-12 going.

But the past is the past; what will the future hold? For starters the Pac-12 universities would have to put out a better product— football and basketball are played better in the Midwest and Southeast, and hence get the t.v. ratings (and t.v. money)