
USC players prepare to take the field before beating UCLA 19-13 at the Rose Bowl on Nov. 23. A federal judge approved a landmark revenue-sharing settlement last week that will change college sports forever. (Gina Ferazzi / LAT)
Benjamin Royer (LA Times) — College sports leaders and athletes were in limbo for months while waiting for a House settlement to be approved. An agreement would create clarity, better supporting college conferences and their respective universities that had been blindly preparing for the next academic year — unsure which name, image and likeness (NIL) rules they’d be playing by.
Late Friday, structure and stability arrived as the House settlement became approved and official.
“The decision on Friday is a significant step forward toward building long-term stability for college sports while protecting the system from bad actors seeking to exploit confusion and uncertainty,” Southeastern Conference commissioner Greg Sankey said during a news conference Monday morning that included commissioners of the Big Ten, Big 12, Atlantic Coast and the Pac 12 conferences.
The House settlement has set the stage for revenue-sharing between universities and their athletes. Claudia Wilken, the presiding judge of California’s Northern District, accepted the final proposal Friday between the NCAA and the plaintiffs, current and former athletes seeking financial compensation for NIL-related backpay.
The NCAA will pay close to $2.8 billion to former athletes — as many as 389,700 athletes who played between June 15, 2016, to Sept. 15, 2024 — across a 10-year period and will also implement a 10-year revenue sharing model that will allow universities to pay current athletes up to $20.5 million per year.
According to the settlement, the total is “22% of the Power Five schools’ average athletic revenues each year” and the revenue-sharing cap will incrementally increase every year.
What is the College Sports Commission and who is leading it?
The newly founded College Sports Commission, led by former MLB executive Bryan Seeley, was created to make sure all NIL deals comply with NCAA rules shaped by the settlement terms.
The commission “will investigate potential rules violations, make factual determinations, issue penalties where appropriate, and participate in the neutral arbitration process set forth in the settlement as necessary,” per a news release naming Seeley as the inaugural chief executive.
Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark said it was a unanimous decision among the commissioners that Seeley was the right person for the role. Tony Petitti, Big Ten commissioner, said that although he didn’t work directly with Seeley during his previous stint at MLB, he saw Commissioner Rob Manfred rely on Seeley’s expertise.
What is “NIL Go” and what role does it play?

UCLA coach DeShaun Foster leads his players onto the field at the Rose Bowl before losing to USC in November. (Wally Skalij / LAT)
The College Sports Commission will work alongside a clearinghouse called “NIL Go,” created by accounting firm Deloitte, to approve or deny any third-party NIL agreements that exceed $600.
“NIL Go” is the technology platform athletes and schools will use to report NIL agreements.
All new third-party NIL deals must now be reported to the clearinghouse as of June 7 — the day after the settlement was approved — although the platform won’t launch online until June 11.
How will the rules be enforced?
The commission is still in the process of determining what punishment schools and athletes might face for violating NIL rules.
“We’re in the process of developing some of those rules and structure,” ACC commissioner Jim Phillips said. “Now that we have Brian [Seeley] on board, I think we’ll be able to move a little bit quicker, but we want to get this right. … Nothing to date right now that we’re ready to come forward with.”
How will the money paid to current athletes be allocated?
The ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12 and SEC were the original parties targeted in lawsuits finally settled by Friday’s ruling.
The expectation is that about 90% of financial resources at their schools will go to revenue sports — football and men’s basketball — with the other 10% being scattered between traditional Olympic sports.
“The decision was made fairly early on that we’d be in a local decision-making [process] about how rev share would work, and then all the decisions that come off of that,” Petitti said of conversations with leaders of Big Ten’s schools. “So that’s where we are, giving our institutions the discretion [on how to allocate revenue-sharing funds] and they want that discretion.”
UCLA men’s basketball coach wears a Men of Westwood T-shirt while speaking to reporters on Oct. 6, 2023. (Courtesy of UCLA Athletics)
Most NIL collectives — such as USC’s House of Victory or UCLA’s Men of Westwood — are expected to focus on marketing and connecting athletes to NIL opportunities rather than brokering agreements and directly paying them. The new revenue-sharing model makes it much easier for schools to directly pay athletes, replacing a role collectives took on in the past when schools were banned from paying athletes.
How will current NIL deals be influenced by new salary cap?
Contracts may need to be restructured because many — but not all — NIL deals were completed through collectives, a process that would now need to receive approval from the Deloitte clearinghouse.
When determining the proper range for NIL deals, “NIL Go” references “market reach” and the “local market” — two factors among many that could work in favor of UCLA and USC because Los Angeles is the second-largest media market in the country and would naturally index high on market reach.
What are the new roster and scholarship rules?

USC men’s basketball players stand during the national anthem before a game against ORE at Galen Center on Dec. 4. (Gina Ferazzi / LAT)
Roster limits will influence all sports. Football teams can now feature up to 105 players, up from 85. Men’s basketball rosters can feature 15 players instead of 13. Some Olympic sports, such as baseball, will see a roster-sizes decrease.
In all sports, schools can offer as many scholarships as their roster limit instead of the previous NCAA scholarship limits. Whereas teams could only offer 11.7 scholarships in baseball, now universities can offer a full scholarship to all 34 players. Softball teams can now offer 25 scholarships rather than 12 in previous seasons. Women’s gymnastics can offer a full 20.
This is not to say all teams will offer full rides to fill every roster spot. In all likelihood, for most Power 4 programs, there will still be walk-on players filling spots on the team. At UCLA, athletic director Martin Jarmond said he plans on keeping UCLA’s scholarship limits at where it was before the settlement — 85 for football and 13 for men’s basketball. The rationale, Jarmond said, is to allow UCLA to provide larger revenue-sharing totals to their athletes instead of splitting funds across full scholarship totals. USC has yet to publicly share its plans for athletic scholarships.
“We have to be bold and innovative in this new world,” Jarmond told The Times on Saturday.“UCLA has always been on the forefront and been a leader and that’s not going to change. We will embrace this new era and we will continue to support our student-athletes at a championship level.”
SEC schools also plan to stick with 85 football roster spots during the 2025 season, a conference spokesman told CBS Sports during the conference’s recent spring meetings.
How would schools outside the Power 4 be influenced by the settlement?
Whereas the Power 4 conferences — and the Pac-12 — automatically opted into the House settlement to end litigation, universities outside the Power 4 will have to opt-in to the revenue-sharing agreement by a June 15 deadline. The list of schools that opt-in will become public after the deadline, according to the commission’s website. The commission claims that even if universities decide not to opt in to the revenue-sharing agreements, they’ll still have to report NIL agreements that go beyond the $600 threshold. It’s unclear how much money these schools will share with their athletes.
Schools such as Long Beach State — should it opt-in to revenue-sharing — could provide further resources to its athletes in sports where Power 4 schools may not. Men’s volleyball, for example, is a perennial national championship contender for Long Beach, winning a championship in 2025. Compared to Power 4 schools that may invest most of its funds into football and men’s basketball, Olympic sports could become crown jewels for smaller athletic departments.
Why do some athletes oppose the settlement?

UCLA’s Cooper Robinson (11) and Ethan Champlin (20) celebrate during a win over Long Beach State in the 2023 NCAA men’s volleyball tournament. Julia Nikhinson / AP)
With likely 90% of revenue-sharing funds headed toward football and men’s basketball, some athletes see the House settlement as the beginning of athletic department restructuring — with Olympic sports being placed on the sidelines in favor of spending more money on high-revenue sports.
Cooper Robinson, who won a men’s volleyball national championship with UCLA in 2024, commented on UCLA Athletics’ Instagram post about the settlement, asking, “So like is this only for Football and Basketball?”
This past year, Grand Canyon University announced the dismantling of its men’s volleyball program. The fear for athletes, especially for a university such as UCLA that had generated $219.5 million in debt over the last six fiscal years (an amount that has been covered by the university) is that smaller-revenue programs such as men’s and women’s volleyball could be cut to move finances elsewhere. Jarmond has committed to preserving Olympic sports at UCLA.
Does the House settlement violate Title IX federal statutes requiring equal opportunities for male and female athletes?
In the years ahead, with most financial resources likely headed to football and men’s basketball rather than its women’s sports programs, universities may have to defend their rationale in Title IX lawsuits. The settlement does not include any language providing direction to universities for how to deal with Title IX — explicitly stating “the Court cannot conclude that violations of Title IX will necessarily occur if and when schools choose to provide compensation and benefits to student-athletes pursuant to the Injunctive Relief Settlement.”
latimes.com
______________
TrojanDailyBlog members — We always encourage you to add factual information, insight, divergent opinions, or new topics to the TDB that don’t necessarily pertain to any particular moderator post or member comment.
We All Knew This Title IX Suit Was Coming. How Long Will It Take To Work Out? Appeal of NCAA settlement won’t stop current athlete payments Dan Murphy (ESPN) — An appeal of the NCAA’s landmark antitrust settlement won’t stop college teams from paying current athletes starting July 1, but it will pause the NCAA’s plans to begin paying former athletes. Several college athletes filed the appeal Wednesday, claiming the deal violates Title IX law. Now the roughly $2.8 billion in negotiated back damages will sit while the appeal works through the system. Attorney John Clune told ESPN he filed… Read more »
USC third baseman and pitcher Ethan Hedges has been named a second-team All-American by Perfect Game USA. Connor Morrissette (USCFootball.com) — Perfect Game USA released its annual college baseball All-American teams this week, and USC third baseman and pitcher Ethan Hedges made the cut! Hedges was selected as a second-team All-American two-way player after leading the Trojans to a 37-23 record and the team’s first NCAA tournament appearance in a decade. Hedges, who was named one of five finalists for the John Olerud two-way player of the year award last week, led USC with a .346 batting average this season. He… Read more »
SC ought to take a serious look at this O-Lineman from Colorado named Deacon Schmitt.The kid is a mauler on the run. He drives the defensive guy 20 yards down field before he pancakes him. He’s got 26 offers.He gets a pancake on virtually every play and he’s quick enough to pull.
https://www.on3.com/db/deacon-schmitt-239259/
I have stayed out of the ND/SC series dispute. Just a note. I am certain Jen Cohen in conjunction with the Board of Trustees is running those negotiations. I doubt LR has ANY input into this decision (which is a result of two really lousy seasons). I am confident this decision will be made based on financial concerns as making the playoffs is now critical for funding your sports teams. Given what I have seen, SC is in very good hands on this one. From what I have seen so far, Jen is going to negotiate a very tough bargain.… Read more »
It has been awhile since I have posted. One of the reasons is I am convinced that the nature of collegiate football changed about 3 years ago and that SC was WAY behind its competitors, particularly Oregon, in adjusting to this new reality. I wrote that I thought SC would catch up but thought it would take a couple of years. Boy, is SC lucky to have Jen Cohen. She is at least a match for any AD in the country, particularly Phil Knight, whom I view as the AD/GM of Oregon athletics. Phil was so far ahead of SC… Read more »
Welcome back. Agree with everything you posted.
Urban Meyer is politicking for the USC HC job? Do you agree with the article author’s conclusion based on Meyer’s conversation with C. Cowherd?
https://saturdayblitz.com/urban-meyer-quietly-roasts-lincoln-riley-and-it-s-clear-he-has-an-agenda
It’s a reach IMO.
Meyer — “I’ve always looked at USC as one of the top-five jobs in America, along with OHIO ST, ALA, UF, and TEXAS (sorry Gators, you’re not there). 7-8 wins at USC is not acceptable. You take a five-hour net and drop it at USC, and you see the best players in the country. USC is USC. I think they’re gonna have a great year. But go 8-5 at OHIO ST and see what happens. “I promised myself I would never call for jobs because I’m not gonna do that.” It sounds like Meyer’s trying to frontload his USC statements… Read more »
OK….let’s play hard to get…..just give him 25% of the gross revenue……LOL.
Urban, back in his “good old days” at OHIO ST before his NFL coaching faceplant with Jacksonville, where he also got caught “grinding” another woman in a bar following a loss in Cincinnati.
Would the majority want Meyer today having been through the past few years of letdown? It’s an interesting question.
I believe he would have great success at USC with at least a Natty. But his integrity has always been questionable. At UF, his players ran rampant and the gator players collectively had a rap sheet that would make the old Hurricane teams proud. It’s a bit conflicting and tempting, but I’d have to pass.
I’d pass too. He’s a great CFB coach, but there’s too much baggage that he brings (how many more times does he need to quit?) and his players are often in trouble, something he never foresees until they’re already in jail. That won’t swim these days in the USC/L.A. market with Jen Cohen in charge.
I wonder what Lincoln Riley would get if he were looking for a new contract at a different school right now? Any takers?
Depends on which community college you are referring to.
😅
As a stock, he would be highly devalued right now.
Did Meyer say anything that wasn’t true? Is USC supposed to be a top 5 program nationally? With a 4-5 hour drive covering the best recruits in the Country shouldn’t USC have the #1 class every year? Should an 8 & 5 record be acceptable? Would that record be acceptable at Ohio St, Alabama, Texas? Has the expectations around this football program been lowered? Did Jen have to take over the program operations from her HC who couldn’t recruit, had terrible assistant coaches and made crucial mistakes playcalling that put his team in jeopardy losing to the Minnesotas & Marylands?… Read more »
Well, since you asked, his inclusion of FL as a top 5 job was a serious reach, especially considering a few teams he had to overlook to include them, like Mich and ND. But yeah, everything else was spot on.
You’re right but while he was coaching there at Florida, it was the SEC’s top program.
Aaron Hernandez, primetime Gator material under Urban Meyer
Prime example.
Yep, but look at it since. (I know…look at USC since PC.) Many schools have had brief runs, but to me that doesn’t make them blue bloods or a top 5 job. Historically, UF hasn’t impacted the national conversation and scene like some others, and from what I read, the program in general is just shy of being in shambles on several fronts and that it’ll take more than just a good coach to get them winning again.
This is interesting news and should help bring equity to college sports. Will be interesting to see how SC handles it but I’m sure Chad Bowden and Jen Cohen will make it work for football and all the other sports.
Isn’t it great to know we have intelligent, totally committed, and powerful people like Jen Cohen and Chad Bowden in charge of USC football now! We’re finally in great hands. USC recruiting has the same feel now that it had when Pete Carroll, Ed O and Lane Kiffin were reeling in talent and championships like nobodies business. What a combination of youth, experience, gamesmanship and coordination we had then. And now, Jen Cohen has positioned USC to take advantage of the finally approved House Settlement, and I am confident she will get what she wants out of Notre Dame, which… Read more »