What’s Wrong With the Pac-12?

This weekend features two big games on the West Coast: Washington at Oregon and Colorado at USC. I hate to say it, but if both road teams lose, the Pac-12 may be unofficially eliminated from the Playoff race only halfway through the season. The only remaining one-loss teams would be the Ducks, the Buffs and 5-1 Washington State, all of whom played such weak nonconference schedules that they’re unlikely to win any arguments against other leagues’ champions.

And this would come on the heels of a historic 1-8 bowl record last season. So how did we get here?

In your opinion, what are several reasons why the Pac-12 has fallen so far behind the other Power 5 conferences?

Michael H.

Stewart Mandel (TheAthletic)  —  I know many Pac-12 fans place the blame primarily on commissioner Larry Scott and his often-maligned TV network, but gaps in TV revenue don’t explain Stanford’s inability to run the football or UCLA’s inability to win a football game.

In any conference, the strength of the league starts with the head coaching lineup. When the Pac-12’s TV deal initially kicked in back in 2012 (at that point a trendsetter at 12 years, $3 billion), a bunch of schools went out and hired high-profile coaches like Washington State’s Mike Leach, Arizona’s Rich Rodriguez, Arizona State’s Todd Graham and UCLA’s Jim Mora. Chip Kelly was still at Oregon, Stanford’s David Shaw was a rising star and USC’s Lane Kiffin hadn’t yet dive-bombed. Things were looking up.

But today, only Leach, Shaw and Utah’s Kyle Whittingham remain at the same schools as they did then. Kelly left for the NFL, and Oregon imploded a few years later. The others had promising starts, then swift downfalls. In the interim, only two schools indisputably upgraded at the top: Washington with Chris Petersen and Colorado with Mike MacIntyre. Not coincidentally, those schools met in the conference championship game two years ago and are currently in first place in their divisions.

That being said, six league schools have made seven coaching changes over the past two offseasons (with Oregon making two), and UCLA landed the esteemed Kelly. So we’re seeing the effects of a conference going through a major transition period. The SEC experienced much the same thing in recent years and saw a dip because of it; the difference is it still had Nick Saban winning national titles.

That’s not to say there aren’t other underlying issues at play. The late start times on ESPN and FS1 and limited distribution for the Pac-12 Network certainly don’t help with recruiting. The growing revenue gap between the Pac-12 ($30.9 million per school) and the Big Ten and SEC ($40-$50 million) may be felt a bit in the ability to hire and retain quality assistant coaches. It’s possible the Pac-12 has just two assistants, Oregon’s Jim Leavitt and UW’s Jimmy Lake, making north of $1 million. (USC’s and Stanford’s numbers are private, so I can’t say that definitively.) Michigan alone had three last season.

But USC won a lot of games under Pete Carroll when the Trojans weren’t likely paying SEC money. Ditto Oregon under Kelly and Stanford under Shaw. I don’t think there’s a huge correlation between the Pac-12’s TV deals and its on-field struggles. A great set of head coaches is far more important.

TheAthletic.com

13
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
  SUBSCRIBE HERE TO RECEIVE NOTICE OF NEW COMMENTS OR REPLIES.  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
TrojanRJJ
Member
Knighted Member
TrojanRJJ
Offline

West Coast football has for the last 40 years been SC and UW (under Don James) with the 4 year break by Oregon under Kelly. UW is now back (due to Peterson) , Oregon has become nationally irrelevant again, and SC stands a chance if the coaching improves. The conference really needs SC to be great for it to thrive, and I do not think that the rest of the conference views it that way. What was Joanie Mitchell’s lyrlic: “You don’t know what you got ’till its gone.” If SC slides into mediocrity, it is going to negatively impact… Read more »

LawyerJohn
Member
Noble Member
LawyerJohn
Offline

SC football has seen worse cycles than the current one. Anybody recall 8 straight losses to SUCLA in the 90s? Or what was it, 12 straight years of not beating ND. I don’t follow or give a hang about the Big-10 or SEC, or any school east of downtown Los Angeles, and why would they care about West Coast football. Everybody is parochial and there’s nothing wrong with that. But I do care about Pac-12 football, and am excited about the SC-Colorado game that probably will decide which school goes to the Pac-12 championship game and a chance at a… Read more »

Trojanman
Member
Active Member
Trojanman
Offline

Mandel got one thing wrong, Pete was the highest paid coach in college football beginning in 2006 until he left for the Seahawks. Daddy Kiffin was making well over $1million per year when working for Lane. The PAC 12 tv contract and the revenue gap is certainly part of the problem, but the biggest problem is the fall of the premiere program in the conference. The screw job by the NCAA crippled USC and with the ensuing coaching woes, it still hasn’t fully recovered. USC has won over twice as many National Championships as the rest of the conference combined,… Read more »

Old_Trojans_never_die
Member
Noble Member

The nail has been hit squarely on head with the leadership of the conference and the crappy television schedule. Allowing teams to be televised after midnight in a half the country is just stupid. It makes the conference look second rate. It also hurts in recruiting. Kids can’t see us on the Crap12 channel unless they sneak into a sports bar. The whole thing is not good and the smarmy tennis player is out of his league. The PAC 12 is being played and the commissioner should go.

Steveg
Member
Diamond Member
Steveg
Offline

There still remains a lot of questions to be answered in the coaching ranks of the PAC12. Will Chip develop ucla into something respectable? Is Sumlin going to flame out and show he is not a good HC. Will Herm become the guy ASU is hoping for? Will Cal be politically correct in their football program? Can USC stand another year of mediocrity to then change and go through the three year test if the hire was good? PAC12 reminds me of the DNC, no real direction to head toward and certainly no leadership whatsoever.

UtahTrojan
Member
Active Member
UtahTrojan
Offline

Wish we had a great coach.

AZTrojan
Member
Active Member
AZTrojan
Offline

Wish we had a coach.